Wow. I hope she recovers fully and quickly.
583 men in six hours.
That’s about 37 seconds each.
You’re assuming one at a time.
Question is the mean jerk time assuming the dtf is presorted.
I think that’s reasonable when when calculating an average.
It also assumes that men were the only other participants. ;)
Wow
Looks more like bullshit to me.
What a lucky female
OnlyFans star Annie Knight is sharing an update amid her recent hospitalization after sleeping with 583 men in six hours.
It’s bizarre that US uses “sleeping with” to mean “had sex with”. Readers clearly understand, she uses the word “sex” in her quotes, but the magazine/site insists on using that bizarre euphemism.
I don’t think that that’s very uncommon. When one “goes to the bathroom”, it’s understood that this is a euphemism for urinating or defecating, not just hanging out there.
TIL I’ve been doing it wrong my whole life /s
Agreed. It just seems like a weird editorial decision. Maybe it’s because I’m not a regular US reader, or I live in a different country, but it seems to slightly obfuscate what happened.
You’re looking way too deep into it. “Sleeping with someone” is such a common expression that nobody can possibly hope to obfuscate anything with it. Everybody knows they fucked. There will be no mistakes, no confusion. Besides, it’s not unusual for different contexts to use different phrases and expressions for the same thing. The press using a “softer” language is not a uniquely American thing by a long shot and it’s kinda weird to assume it would be.
Not an American either btw.
I am currently using the bathroom… I mean defecating.
The same turn of phrase exists in e.g. German.
I’ve always hated the saying. Clearly you’re not sleeping if you’re boning…
One fewer word/syllable.
I think they should pare it down further though, and just say ‘fucking’
Seconded.
You mean to tell me that when someone says that they’re taking a shit, it shouldn’t mean literally turd burgaling?
Jfc it’s just as bizarre as every other fucking cultures language on earth but I get it, it’s popular to shit on America while it’s fighting a civil war that was never declared. Easier than realizing this shit show is coming for you next.
I’m not talking about the US, I’m talking about US Magazine. I’ve seen other US publications use “sex” to refer to sex.
The “Us” in “Us Magazine” isn’t all caps
The great irony being that Us Magazine is a tabloid that reports almost exclusively on celebrity gossip - people who clearly aren’t “Us”
I love the euphemism that she “slept with” 583 guys. I mean that’s a lotta naps in 6 hours! Takes me at least 20 minutes to drift off.
deleted by creator
“I don’t understand why people have such an issue with it. These guys are just out here living life. They’ve been given an opportunity, and they’re like, ‘F*** it. Like, let’s just do it.’ They’re just having some fun. I think the people that are hating [are] probably just jealous, and their lives are really boring …I mean, the more they hate on me, the more views I get, and the more money I make.”
“…I mean, the more they hate on me, the more views I get, and the more money I make.”
I think that pretty much sums up a big part of America’s problem right there lol
The internet hate machine is hardly an exclusively American problem.
This is the third name I’ve seen with a sex with hundreds of men title in the last month or so.
In this a new trend??? In which case … I hate to be old school but wtf
i assure you that group sex is not a new trend. it predates agriculture, civilization, and humanity itself.
those numbers would have been incredibly difficult to organize in the pre-internet era however.
Possible in the right park or movie theatre in the 60’s or 70’s….
It is, and there’s a handful of people trying to one-up each other.
With great financial success, I might add.
I think they might be trying for more than just one up
With great financial success, I might add.
Hopefully that hospital trip worth it.
She’s buying a house at 28, so possibly.
Besides, I’ve needed medical treatment for something that happened at work before.
I sprained my ankle playing soccer at a work-related event, I wouldn’t put it in the same ball park as bleeding genitals, though
dmgl
The next TikTok challenge
Anything to help the children of Gaza.
I can figure out what I find more gross. The man that participated in this… …or the female. Just cause you can, doesn’t mean you should. Talking about setting yourself apart. This country is nothing but spectacle.
Does clutching pearls at other people‘s actions serve you well in life or are you just bantering here like a little Karen getting your pearls bunched up?
the female
Go back
the female
Lol incel alert.
Have you ever seen a woman who was naked in front of you willingly?
Ew, gross, an incel. Don’t feed it it should go away.
I can figure it out. You are more gross than either.
🚨🚨 INCEL ALERT 🚨🚨
Some people just built different I guess
Someone is going to feel sore everywhere for a while
Honestly i’m sorry but why do it if it hurts? Is it just for fame?
She’s an OF model and this is her niche. It’s literally her job.
No its her stunt to make her job stand out and very clearly detrimental to her ability to do her job.
Wow that’s quite a high score!
Well alrighty then
Either she never read the book “Snuff” or she wanted to see if it would really happen…
What are the chances that one of the first 50 or so people had some kind of STD and this is just a mass-spreader event? What are the chances that she now has permanently damaged her health?
I’m fine with sex between consenting adults as long as it happens safely. I just don’t see how this could possibly have been safe. And even if (and that’s a big “if”) all of the participants got tested beforehand, what are the chances that the next person “inspired by” her will also do this safely?
Typically professionals do ensure all their partners are tested beforehand.
what are the chances that the next person “inspired by” her will also do this safely?
Puritanical hand wringing. Tons of people have unsafe sex every day. If you want to lower STI spread, create public awareness campaigns and improve sex ed for students.
I hope you’re right about the testing. Wish it said in the article. Also more sex ed is always a good idea.
Sadly I don’t think you’re wrong about the puritanical bit. I didn’t think I was but the idea of this many sexual partners in this short a time does make me uncomfortable. Definitely gave me something to think about and maybe uncovered some bias worth working on.
How does that work? I usually take 2 to 4 hours, how are all the other men supposed to fit in, in only 6 hours?
Or is it literally sleeping? Because I’ve been to a 80.000 people festival, there have been several thousand sleeping at the same time I was sleeping, so my track record is better then hers.
