• @huginn@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1910 months ago

    Not terribly surprised. When I tried the app out I didn’t really get the appeal. It was like adding a comments section to existing news feeds and didn’t provide enough tailoring or algorithmic understanding of reading habits to be a compelling offering.

    Besides the fact that they were using a chrome embedded browser, meaning I couldn’t even ad block on the sites I visited: which made the reading experience nearly impossible.

    • @reddig33@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      610 months ago

      It had a built in reader mode to bypass the shitty ad-ridden websites. My favorite feature was the block words list. No more stories with the word “kardashian” for example.

      • @huginn@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        410 months ago

        Must’ve come after I gave it a shot: I picked it up pretty soon after release.

        • TwinTusks
          link
          fedilink
          English
          210 months ago

          The main attraction for me was the reader mode which blocks all ads, it also pushes similar articles from different new sites that I have never heard before (its a nice thing).

    • dantheclammanOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      410 months ago

      I found it worked pretty well, seemed to understand my interests pretty well after a couple days, when I usually don’t feel that way, having tried many many similar apps. The chrome web view wasn’t ideal, but I use pihole which helped :)

  • leaskovski
    link
    fedilink
    510 months ago

    What are the best news aggregators that people use these days? I have fallen back to using news.google.com, which Im not that too happy about, but it does seem to work ok for me.

  • @reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    410 months ago

    It’s a shame. It was a good news aggregator. Much better than the news app included with iOS. You’d think if they lost the comments section/moderation and added some ads and a premium ad-free tier, it could’ve stayed in business. Also surprised they didn’t find a buyer who’d want to slap their name on existing tech.

    • capital
      link
      fedilink
      English
      310 months ago

      I tried it as a replacement to Apple News and found it to be much worse.

      As the other comment said, the “AI” integration was poorly implemented and didn’t allow enough tailoring to make it worth it.

      The comments and social features shouldn’t have been implemented.

      On top of that, it didn’t have big news publishers like the Atlantic. Had plenty of listicle BS from sites I’d never heard of before. As I scrolled through I found myself thinking “who TF is this?”.

  • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝
    link
    fedilink
    English
    110 months ago

    I rather enjoyed it while it lasted but I was rather just posting interesting bits I was posting here, so perhaps here is the best alternative. 🤷

    I may have also been using it as a kind of replacement for del.icio.us, which is much missed. I gave Postmarked a go but it isn’t doing it for me.