@fastandcurious@lemmy.world to Memes@lemmy.ml • 2 years agoOh No, anywaylemmy.worldimagemessage-square23fedilinkarrow-up1431arrow-down121
arrow-up1410arrow-down1imageOh No, anywaylemmy.world@fastandcurious@lemmy.world to Memes@lemmy.ml • 2 years agomessage-square23fedilink
minus-square@nublug@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilink15•2 years agouh 1.458333, 3’s repeating of course so that’s 1:27:30 when accounting for minutes instead of fractional ten-hours. that is, of course if it’s a 10 hour DAY clock; if it’s a 10 hour am/pm clock then it’s 2.91666 6’s repeating fractional ten-am/pm-hours which is 2:54:59 am. i think. i’m not super good at math, but i tried.
minus-square@Rolando@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink12•2 years agoCan you convert that to Unix time? (seconds since Jan 1 1970).
minus-squareTurboWafflzlinkfedilink9•2 years agoCould I get it as a 13 hour clock with 56 seconds per minute?
uh, 3:30.
Can you convert that to a 10 hour clock?
uh 1.458333, 3’s repeating of course
so that’s 1:27:30 when accounting for minutes instead of fractional ten-hours.
that is, of course if it’s a 10 hour DAY clock; if it’s a 10 hour am/pm clock then it’s 2.91666 6’s repeating fractional ten-am/pm-hours which is 2:54:59 am.
i think. i’m not super good at math, but i tried.
Can you convert that to Unix time? (seconds since Jan 1 1970).
12,600. No date was specified.
Go to sleep
uh, 1:45:83
Could I get it as a 13 hour clock with 56 seconds per minute?
…No.
Fair enough, that sounds confusing
3:30