• @gastationsushi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      161 year ago

      A second Trump term is everything you hate about Biden plus more shit. Biden still the lesser of two evils, you should vote for him.

      But I will say Biden is a fucking moron for doing so many unpopular things late in his term. I guess some of these geriatric Dems would rather punch down on the left than secure democracy against it’s biggest threat in decades. I get the frustration.

        • @gastationsushi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          12
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It’s voting for less evil. And staying home is an extra vote for more evil.

          But I promise, get the frustration. We live in a fucked up system that filters out good candidates.

            • That’s not how American voting works, if everyone voted for who they think is absolute best, the group with the most unity wins, which is exactly why political parties exist.

              • @CheeseChief@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -11 year ago

                Yes, Unity. That is what I’m referring to. It just seems voters are only worried about being on the “winning” side and that is their Unity - winning and not what is best for them.

                  • @CheeseChief@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    01 year ago

                    Sorry, I’m just saying that if people all voted for a 3rd party candidate that wanted govt out of their pockets and personal life things would be so much better than just voting to win or voting for the lesser of two evils. Does that make sense? Not sure if I’m articulating my thought well enough.

              • @CheeseChief@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                01 year ago

                I just think that most people would like to have Government out of their wallet and personal lives. If those people all voted for a candidate who wanted the same, then change could happen.

                • @lolcatnip@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  1
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Most people aren’t libertarians.

                  And there’s little to no historical precedent for people spontaneously uniting around a third party candidate. There is, OTOH, precedent for the spoiler effect causing an unpopular candidate to win.

              • @CheeseChief@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -11 year ago

                I just think if people would look at what they value, find a matching candidate, vote for said candidate; things would be less of a shits show.

                • @TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 year ago

                  Exactly; you don’t understand basic game theory. The options you lay out are not in fact part of the equation. If we’re playing a game in which you have only two choices, opting for a third make-believe alternative is going to result in a losing outcome every time.

            • ASeriesOfPoorChoices
              link
              fedilink
              31 year ago

              Are your values based around helping the worst of two evils get in power? Because it sure sounds like it.

        • @lolcatnip@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          81 year ago

          Voting to express yourself is pure vanity. Vote in a way that will actually influence the outcome in a positive way. If, that is, you want to do something other than feel good about how morally superior you are.

    • @ALostInquirer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      101 year ago

      Who is running third party for folks to rally behind? Moreover, who is running that would somehow overcome both major parties’ candidates by drawing enough away from them to win or in some way effect a change in process?

    • Let me know when there’s a third party candidate worth my time. Jill Stein has done nothing to earn my vote, and unless she addresses her anti science remarks, she’ll never get it.

    • @voidMainVoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      -61 year ago

      Everybody needs to vote for who they honestly think the best candidate is. If that’s Biden, vote Biden. If that’s Jill Stein or Cornel West or whoever the Libertarians are running, then vote for them.

      Vote your hopes, not your fears. Or, as Jill Stein said, “Don’t vote for the lesser evil. Vote for the greater good.”

      • That’s some “When they go low, we go high” bullshit.

        Politics isn’t about falling in love with the perfect candidate. That’s never going to happen – and if it seems like someone is that perfect candidate, it’s a giant red flag.

        Vote for what’s realistic. Vote like an adult. Vote with your head, not your heart.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        fedilink
        01 year ago

        Ah, that would be the Jill Stein who has never tried to run for mayor or congress or governor, the Jill Stein who thinks it’s the presidency or nothing. She has no interest in changing anything. There is no reason to listen to her.