sunnie to Programmer Humor@programming.dev • 2 years agono.. just nolemmy.caimagemessage-square93fedilinkarrow-up1562arrow-down118
arrow-up1544arrow-down1imageno.. just nolemmy.casunnie to Programmer Humor@programming.dev • 2 years agomessage-square93fedilink
minus-square@cmdrkeen@programming.devlinkfedilink83•2 years agoHonestly not the worst thing I’ve seen.
minus-square@xmunk@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilink14•2 years agoI’d like you to think for a moment about CTEs, the HAVING clause, window functions and every other funky and useful thing you can do in SQL … Now just think, do you think that this syntax supports all those correctly?
minus-squarePrimarily0617linkfedilink33•2 years agosql syntax doesn’t support even itself correctly i fail to see your point
minus-square@cmdrkeen@programming.devlinkfedilink16•2 years agoProbably no better or worse than any other ORM written in a more traditional language. Worst comes to worst, you can always escape to plain SQL.
Honestly not the worst thing I’ve seen.
I’d like you to think for a moment about CTEs, the HAVING clause, window functions and every other funky and useful thing you can do in SQL … Now just think, do you think that this syntax supports all those correctly?
sql syntax doesn’t support even itself correctly i fail to see your point
Probably no better or worse than any other ORM written in a more traditional language. Worst comes to worst, you can always escape to plain SQL.
deleted by creator