• @Jimbob0i0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      I mean when even the federalist society are penning their opinions on various publications supporting such a position…

      • @gac11@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        Isn’t the opposite true though as well? Can’t red states just make up reasons to remove biden if a conviction isn’t required?

        • Sure, if they could identify an instance in which he “engaged in insurrection or rebellion […], or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof”. Biden has never committed such an offense, so in order for red states to attempt this they’d have to fabricate facts and have a sufficient number of state officials go along with it, essentially The Big Lie 2.0.

        • @ganksy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          22 years ago

          It is insurrection specific so states would have the burden of proving (if they cared about proof) Biden was engaged with an insurrection.