• @jopepa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    41 year ago

    One exception, the argument is about spelling or grammar then it’s kinda invited mockery. Aside from that you’re just dealing with an ableist, dyslexia is the most common learning disability

    • Funkytom467
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      Dyslexia is common, but people for whom english is not their first language, whose learning is still in progress. Those are even more common on the internet.

    • @xor@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      i do have a problem with intentionally mutilating words tho… like “parentification” and “enshitification”…
      although the second is a little bit funny…
      or when people intentionally redefine words… like racism as meaning “systemic and systematic racism as experienced by non-whites by whites in america” and as such it’s impossible to be “racist” against white people…
      but it’s just stupid… racism and “systemic racism” are two different concepts…

      • @jopepa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I don’t really understand your point. Portmanteaus and coining new words are useful in conveying complex concepts, though. If you wanted to have a conversation about parentification would you rather have one word to encompass that or have to say “the effect of having to be a care giver to your caregivers during your formative years” every time you need to reference that concept in the discussion.

        What makes that a mutilation instead of more efficient?

        The racism thing is confusing because racism encompasses both forms but there are specific descriptors for unique expressions of the same thing. Just like a square is a rectangle but a rectangle isn’t necessarily a square. That’s not really redefining, systemic racism has been racism the whole time, too. We’re just aware enough to have discussions about the specific ways it effects society today.

        Edit: redefining “literally” to accommodate people using incorrectly on the other hand was a misstep for the English language, though. So I don’t necessarily disagree, I just think you picked bad examples.