@AccidentalLemming@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 2 years agoFrance wants your browser to censor the web, and Mozilla is petitioning against itfoundation.mozilla.orgexternal-linkmessage-square213fedilinkarrow-up11.97Karrow-down116file-textcross-posted to: tech@kbin.socialtechnology@lemmy.world
arrow-up11.95Karrow-down1external-linkFrance wants your browser to censor the web, and Mozilla is petitioning against itfoundation.mozilla.org@AccidentalLemming@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 2 years agomessage-square213fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: tech@kbin.socialtechnology@lemmy.world
minus-square@Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglish32•2 years agoThey indicted 7 people for Terrorism last year because they encrypted their disks, used tail as their OS and signal for communication.
minus-square@AccidentalLemming@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglish14•edit-22 years agodeleted by creator
minus-square@Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglish18•2 years agoIt’s in French : https://www.laquadrature.net/2023/06/05/affaire-du-8-decembre-le-chiffrement-des-communications-assimile-a-un-comportement-terroriste/
minus-squareCyborganismlinkfedilinkEnglish5•2 years agoHey thanks for that. I heard about it but couldn’t find any details about it
minus-square@suction@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish-2•2 years agoNo, that wasn’t the “reason” like you want to make it sound by using because without any modifier like “also”.
minus-square@Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglish1•2 years agoHow would adding “also” fit in my sentence. I tried but couldn’t.
minus-square@t3h_fool@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish2•2 years ago“They indicted 7 people for Terrorism last year, in part because they encrypted their disks, used tail as their OS and signal for communication.” would work maybe.
minus-square@Diabolo96@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglish6•2 years agoEnglish isn’t my native language but still it feels very off. Is it even correct ?
minus-square@ADTJ@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglish4•2 years agoIt’s my native language and I have no idea what they’re getting at either. Don’t worry…
minus-square@suction@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish-1•2 years ago“Correct” as in an allowed use? Yes.
minus-square@phonyphanty@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglish0•2 years agoThat just makes it harder to read :( I think the original sentence is grammatically fine.
minus-square@suction@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish0•2 years agoMore words make read harder, that’s right. But you can’t use fewer words if the meaning changes because of that.
They indicted 7 people for Terrorism last year because they encrypted their disks, used tail as their OS and signal for communication.
deleted by creator
It’s in French : https://www.laquadrature.net/2023/06/05/affaire-du-8-decembre-le-chiffrement-des-communications-assimile-a-un-comportement-terroriste/
Hey thanks for that. I heard about it but couldn’t find any details about it
No, that wasn’t the “reason” like you want to make it sound by using because without any modifier like “also”.
How would adding “also” fit in my sentence. I tried but couldn’t.
“They indicted 7 people for Terrorism last year, in part because they encrypted their disks, used tail as their OS and signal for communication.” would work maybe.
“also because”?
English isn’t my native language but still it feels very off. Is it even correct ?
It’s my native language and I have no idea what they’re getting at either.
Don’t worry…
“Correct” as in an allowed use? Yes.
That just makes it harder to read :( I think the original sentence is grammatically fine.
More words make read harder, that’s right. But you can’t use fewer words if the meaning changes because of that.