@dvdnet62@feddit.nl to Technology@lemmy.mlEnglish • 1 year agoYouTube puts third-party clients on notice: Show ads or get blockedarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square274fedilinkarrow-up1432arrow-down19
arrow-up1423arrow-down1external-linkYouTube puts third-party clients on notice: Show ads or get blockedarstechnica.com@dvdnet62@feddit.nl to Technology@lemmy.mlEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square274fedilink
minus-square@Dymonika@beehaw.orglinkfedilink-4•edit-21 year ago was purely for security reasons and not for disabling ad blockers. I had not heard of Manifest v3 and actually can’t tell if you’re being sarcastic or not. I guess you are.
minus-square@QueerQuery@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilink21•1 year agohttps://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2021/12/googles-manifest-v3-still-hurts-privacy-security-innovation https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2021/12/chrome-users-beware-manifest-v3-deceitful-and-threatening https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2023/11/google-chrome-will-limit-ad-blockers-starting-june-2024/ They’ve been trying for years to implement this at a large price to the users. They always try to hide under the guise of security. https://www.ghacks.net/2024/04/16/google-intensifies-fight-against-youtube-adblockers/ https://lemmy.ml/post/14446619
minus-squareivylinkfedilink-3•1 year agoMan they’re fucking out of their minds!!! I only care about how this will affect Floorp’s user agent spoofing abilities thought 😶🌫️🌫️
minus-square@macaroni1556@lemmy.calinkfedilink5•1 year agoThey’re not being sarcastic, they are repeating Google’s (bs) justification
minus-squareSneezycatlinkfedilink7•1 year agoThey are being sarcastic, with the emphasis on “purely”, while saying Google’s justification. It’s exactly to point out it’s bs.
minus-square0x1C3B00DAlinkfedilink5•1 year agoyes exactly what sneezycat said. I was being sarcastic and pointing out that Manifest V3 was always a crackdown on ad blocking and nothing else.
minus-square@macaroni1556@lemmy.calinkfedilink2•1 year agoSure, I guess I maintain its that’s not what sarcasm is but we do agree on the point
minus-squareSneezycatlinkfedilink2•edit-21 year agoIf it is not sarcasm then the justification is not bs. And OP agrees it is sarcasm.
I had not heard of Manifest v3 and actually can’t tell if you’re being sarcastic or not. I guess you are.
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2021/12/googles-manifest-v3-still-hurts-privacy-security-innovation
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2021/12/chrome-users-beware-manifest-v3-deceitful-and-threatening
https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2023/11/google-chrome-will-limit-ad-blockers-starting-june-2024/
They’ve been trying for years to implement this at a large price to the users. They always try to hide under the guise of security.
https://www.ghacks.net/2024/04/16/google-intensifies-fight-against-youtube-adblockers/
https://lemmy.ml/post/14446619
Man they’re fucking out of their minds!!!
I only care about how this will affect Floorp’s user agent spoofing abilities thought 😶🌫️🌫️
They’re not being sarcastic, they are repeating Google’s (bs) justification
They are being sarcastic, with the emphasis on “purely”, while saying Google’s justification. It’s exactly to point out it’s bs.
yes exactly what sneezycat said. I was being sarcastic and pointing out that Manifest V3 was always a crackdown on ad blocking and nothing else.
Sure, I guess I maintain its that’s not what sarcasm is but we do agree on the point
If it is not sarcasm then the justification is not bs. And OP agrees it is sarcasm.