@Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee to Memes@lemmy.ml • 2 years agoLemmy might, MIGHT have a small bias towards the leftlemm.eeimagemessage-square1782fedilinkarrow-up11.36Karrow-down1319
arrow-up11.05Karrow-down1imageLemmy might, MIGHT have a small bias towards the leftlemm.ee@Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee to Memes@lemmy.ml • 2 years agomessage-square1782fedilink
minus-square@Noughmad@programming.devlinkfedilink2•2 years agoDo you mean their economy and policies, or their people? In either case, I agree.
minus-square@Noughmad@programming.devlinkfedilink1•2 years agoThey didn’t say “be” Scandinavia, but “do”.
minus-square@DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafelinkfedilink3•2 years agoAh, I see. This is correct and praxis, date more Scandinavian hotties.
minus-squareEgon [they/them]linkfedilinkEnglish0•2 years agoWhy would what people your country has matter?
minus-square@Noughmad@programming.devlinkfedilink1•2 years agoRead the comment that I replied to. It does not say “have”, but “do”.
minus-squareEgon [they/them]linkfedilinkEnglish0•2 years agoYeah and then you wrote “in either case, I agree” as in you think it would be better to have Scandinavians, than whatever you have now, which is why I ask what you mean by that?
minus-square@Noughmad@programming.devlinkfedilink2•2 years agoThe two cases were “do (meaning ‘emulate’) their economy and policies” and “do (meaning ‘have sex with’) their people”. No “have” anywhere.
minus-squareEgon [they/them]linkfedilinkEnglish2•2 years agoOkay that does make more sense, I had trouble parsing the text, thank you for taking the time to explain it.
Do you mean their economy and policies, or their people? In either case, I agree.
deleted by creator
They didn’t say “be” Scandinavia, but “do”.
Ah, I see.
This is correct and praxis, date more Scandinavian hotties.
Why would what people your country has matter?
Read the comment that I replied to. It does not say “have”, but “do”.
Yeah and then you wrote “in either case, I agree” as in you think it would be better to have Scandinavians, than whatever you have now, which is why I ask what you mean by that?
The two cases were “do (meaning ‘emulate’) their economy and policies” and “do (meaning ‘have sex with’) their people”. No “have” anywhere.
Okay that does make more sense, I had trouble parsing the text, thank you for taking the time to explain it.