@dvdnet62@feddit.nl to Technology@lemmy.mlEnglish • 1 year agoGirl, 15, speaks out after classmate made deepfake nudes of her and posted onlinewww.independent.co.ukexternal-linkmessage-square117fedilinkarrow-up1302arrow-down123
arrow-up1279arrow-down1external-linkGirl, 15, speaks out after classmate made deepfake nudes of her and posted onlinewww.independent.co.uk@dvdnet62@feddit.nl to Technology@lemmy.mlEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square117fedilink
minus-square@Nyoka@lemm.eelinkfedilink31•1 year agoIn this case, yes. Visually indistinguishable from a photo is considered CSAM. We don’t need any new laws about AI to get these assholes. Revenge porn laws and federal CSAM statutes will do.
minus-square@papertowels@lemmy.onelinkfedilink5•edit-21 year agoNothing about your comment addressed why it should be treated differently if it’s ai-generated but visually indistinguishable.
minus-square@papertowels@lemmy.onelinkfedilink6•1 year agoJust passing through, no strong opinions on the matter nor is it something I wish to do deep dive research on. Just wanted to point out that your original comment was indeed just a threat that did nothing to address OPs argument.
In this case, yes. Visually indistinguishable from a photo is considered CSAM. We don’t need any new laws about AI to get these assholes. Revenge porn laws and federal CSAM statutes will do.
Removed by mod
deleted by creator
Removed by mod
Still on your fuckshit, I see. Smh.
Removed by mod
deleted by creator
Removed by mod
Nothing about your comment addressed why it should be treated differently if it’s ai-generated but visually indistinguishable.
Removed by mod
Just passing through, no strong opinions on the matter nor is it something I wish to do deep dive research on.
Just wanted to point out that your original comment was indeed just a threat that did nothing to address OPs argument.
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
deleted by creator