@Pacattack57@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world • 1 year agoIf I live in a red state, would it be better to vote for rfk to take votes away from trump?message-square88fedilinkarrow-up156arrow-down131file-text
arrow-up125arrow-down1message-squareIf I live in a red state, would it be better to vote for rfk to take votes away from trump?@Pacattack57@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world • 1 year agomessage-square88fedilinkfile-text
minus-square@Lemming421@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish20•edit-21 year agoTo demonstrate the lack of a “clear mandate”. Yes, Trump will win if he gets one more vote than Biden, but the more he loses the popular vote by, the more justification people have for protesting. So if he wins on electoral college votes but loses the popular vote by a landslide, at least it shows what The People are actually thinking.
minus-square@Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink-5•1 year agoWe can just as easily define the popular vote as being the sum of all non Trump votes. No Trump doesn’t need to be Yes Biden.
minus-square@vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilink11•edit-21 year agoIt doesn’t matter how you define it. It matters how the people that report on it define it. And almost universally, that’s horse race numbers. Third parties are pretty much invisible for 95% of people until they start breaking into the horse race. Nobody have a fuck about Ralph Nader or Pat Buchanan till they mattered for the result of the actual election in 2000. But only after the fact.
minus-square@Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink-3•1 year ago It matters how the people that report on it define it. No, it matter how the strategy analysts view the raw data. Not the media. Third parties are pretty much invisible for 95% of people until they start breaking into the horse race. Only if you focus on winning. Bernie didn’t run in the primaries to win. He ran to influence.
minus-square@jpreston2005@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink7•1 year ago Bernie didn’t run in the primaries to win. oh just stfu
minus-square@Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink-1•1 year agoHelp help. I’m being repressed.
To demonstrate the lack of a “clear mandate”.
Yes, Trump will win if he gets one more vote than Biden, but the more he loses the popular vote by, the more justification people have for protesting.
So if he wins on electoral college votes but loses the popular vote by a landslide, at least it shows what The People are actually thinking.
We can just as easily define the popular vote as being the sum of all non Trump votes.
No Trump doesn’t need to be Yes Biden.
It doesn’t matter how you define it. It matters how the people that report on it define it. And almost universally, that’s horse race numbers.
Third parties are pretty much invisible for 95% of people until they start breaking into the horse race.
Nobody have a fuck about Ralph Nader or Pat Buchanan till they mattered for the result of the actual election in 2000. But only after the fact.
No, it matter how the strategy analysts view the raw data. Not the media.
Only if you focus on winning. Bernie didn’t run in the primaries to win. He ran to influence.
oh just stfu
Help help. I’m being repressed.