• @scarabine@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    110 months ago

    No. My god, no. What sort of nonsense is that?

    You’re taking the position of a catastrophic extreme in response to someone saying they should have been more circumspect about where their money came from.

    They should have been more circumspect, though. There’s leagues between acknowledging that and saying that they should be prosecuted by the DOJ.

    • @idiomaddict@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      510 months ago

      How is that extreme?

      Prosecution isn’t execution, it is trying them for a crime that they may have committed. If they’re found guilty, even punishment could include things like seizing the money paid to them for those videos and putting watermark warnings on those videos explaining who funded them or taking them down entirely, not exclusively jail time.

      • @scarabine@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        110 months ago

        It’s not extreme to seek their prosecution, it’s an extreme leap to jump from a post about how they should’ve known better (they really should have!) to “They should be prosecuted by the DOJ”.

        I’m not sure they need to be prosecuted to have these funds seized, though. The government doesn’t even need to ask them for it I don’t think, depending on how the case proceeds. If the money is part of the case it is probably part of the verdict.