our expanded focus on online advertising won’t be embraced by everyone in our community

you don’t say

  • rhabarbaOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1312 hours ago

    Creators and journalists need money to survive, and currently, ad-supported viewing is necessary for that to happen.

    The only way out of this is to block advertising. I, personally, think that you should not have a website if you can’t pay for it yourself, but the only acceptable kind of website income is a paywall. If you just have “better advertising”, advertising will never go away. And I hate ads.

    • @d0ntpan1c@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      47 hours ago

      I, personally, think that you should not have a website if you can’t pay for it yourself

      You might want to consider how expensive web hosting can be, depending on the content and traffic. A belief like that can shut out a huge portion of the world from being able to even bother with a web site. Even a simple blog can get very expensive due to traffic. Maybe not expensive enough for your average 1st world individual… But that still excludes a large portion of the population with internet access.

      • rhabarbaOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        23 hours ago

        So? Is anyone who can’t afford one legally obliged to have a website?

        • @d0ntpan1c@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          02 hours ago

          No, but if its prohibitively impossible to do so, people with legitimate good ideas will never be able to do anything about it. Barriers to entry only serve the wealthy.