• NutWrench
    link
    fedilink
    English
    124 months ago

    THIS is why people have a problem with “tankies.”

    Budapest, 1956.

      • Diva (she/her)
        link
        fedilink
        344 months ago

        I’ve been doing antiwar protests since Iraq- absolutely massive and totally ignored by the government. It was a bit radicalizing.

        I’ve always considered myself an anarchist. These days I get called a tankie just for being opposed to wars and vocally opposing my own governments complicity in genocide. Somehow the meaning of tankie got flipped to mean the people opposed to sending in the tanks. Most ml’s I’ve known are the first people to shit on Khrushchev anyways.

        • @horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          -1
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Do you support Chinese or Russian imperialism? Do you think Uyghurs are being peacefully integrated into society? Do you think the Ukranian president is a Nazi? Was Assad forcefully ousted by Western powers for merely doing what is best for Syria? Does China have a right to control Taiwan and all territorial waters around Taiwan? Is North Korea the greatest and most transparent democracy?

          The US is currently complicit in a genocide that BiBi and Trump are looking to expand. Australia is expanding and encouraging a genocide in Papua New Guinea for mineral rights on the islands. Germany is flirting with literal Nazis because of energy prices. The Entire West is overlooking slavery in Saudi Arabia for cheap oil.

          If you make apologies for “Communist” imperialism and only decry Western imperialiasm you might be a tankie. That’s the general definition as I understand it. I’m happy to be corrected and learn more.

          • @humanspiral@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            04 months ago

            Do you support Chinese or Russian imperialism?

            There is none. We used to think that US Canada relationship was mutual out of necessity of being neighbours. US opinion mattered more, but an impression of “pluralism” was maintained, but there were no CIA NGOs in place to subjugate Canadians to US empire. It just seems natural for Canadians to support US pretenses of freedom. That Russia wishes its neighbours to not be subverted to US empire in fanatical hatred towards Russia does not make it an empire. China has neighbours with same CIA antagonism. Taiwan, afaik, is still US official policy to be diplomatically reintegrated,

            Resistance to US empire doesn’t make you one.

            Do you think Uyghurs are being peacefully integrated into society?

            Metrics for the region are very strong. In the history of counter terrorism, education and job creation seem like the most progressive solution. Those Uyghurs part of the US funded Islamist/ISIS coalition ruling Syria are making a new fuss, and US money to destabilize and demonize is always available, without reflecting reality.

            Do you think the Ukranian president is a Nazi? Was Assad forcefully ousted by Western powers for merely doing what is best for Syria?

            100% both are US funded puppet regimes. Global warming related droughts/famine is opportunity to build anger over not feeding everyone, and only job available is a militant.

            If you make apologies for “Communist” imperialism and only decry Western imperialiasm you might be a tankie.

            Hatred of Russia is that they are former communists. The core of Ukrainian nazi resentment, and apartheid ethnostate laws enacted to help provoke war. If the only reason for warmongering on China is their expected invasion of Taiwan, the status quo could be easily negotiated. There is zero evidence based assessment of Uyghur policy, or metrics to befriend China. Complaints about Uyghurs are exclusively made to warmonger through whinning. Obviously, abuse of Muslims is not a principled standard to avoid. Only US propaganda of hatred applies, and you must believe all of it, or you are a tankie.

      • TacoButtPlug
        link
        fedilink
        English
        84 months ago

        Yea, neoliberal ideology is fucked all around. I prefer progressives over self declared libs.

          • @humanspiral@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            44 months ago

            Over 3m Iraqis were killed since Gulf war 1. Over 1m just from Albreight/Clintons proud sanctions on food and medicine. To ensure a destabilized Iraq puppet government, Ian Bremer declared Sunnis (Bathists) ineligible for government jobs as one of the first decrees of his administratorship. That was enough to create ISIS creation motivation by itself, but there are allegations of direct financial support for ISIS by US, and its leaders became leaders as a result of being released from US controlled prisons.

          • zarp86
            link
            fedilink
            -244 months ago

            When you draw the line of Liberal v Conservative so far to the right it includes George Bush, it ceases to lose all meaning.

            • Cowbee [he/they]
              link
              fedilink
              314 months ago

              Liberalism is the ideological component of Capitalism. Conservativism is a type of Liberalism.

            • @Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              84 months ago

              Liberals were so proud to have Dick Cheney’s endorsement last election. And they were big mad that GWB didn’t endorse.

          • zarp86
            link
            fedilink
            -174 months ago

            That is all accurate and I don’t disagree with you. But the picture was of an invasion under Bush, not Clinton, so I responded as such.

            The problem that I take is l:

            Also all American politicians of “both” parties are liberals.

            I’m wondering what your definition of Liberal is. Up until like 2020, it was Liberal v Conservative and when I look it up in the dictionary I get “Relating to or denoting a political and social philosophy that promotes individual rights, civil liberties, democracy, and free enterprise.”

            But Liberal on Lemmy appears to be anything to the right of a theoretical Star Trek post scarcity utopia.

            • @RangerJosie@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              184 months ago

              The internationally recognized measure of left-right. Not the uniquely American one that’s skewed all to fuck.

              There is no left at all in American politics. The closest we’ve gotten is Bernie Sanders. He’s a moderate everywhere but here.

            • @humanspiral@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              24 months ago

              Noe liberal and neo con differences are how you “kiss babies”/comment on social and cultural issues, while electioneering to make the war mongering big bucks from power.

    • Cowbee [he/they]
      link
      fedilink
      39
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Whatever you do, don’t look up the numbers of Soviet officials lynched before the tanks were sent in, or who the counter-revolutionaries set free from prison to help with the lynching and rioting (spoiler: literal Nazis).

    • Gucci_Minh [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      334 months ago

      They have a problem with stopping a fascist counter-revolution that did anti-jewish pogroms and elevated the landlord class in Hungary?

    • CutieBootieTootie [she/her]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      254 months ago

      Marxist Leninists are defined primarily by two principles:

      • Anti Imperialism / Internationalism
      • Defense and Construction of Socialism

      It means that the Soviet Union was chiefly responsible for ending the Holocaust and supporting liberation struggles around the world. It means Cuba was able to transform itself from a strip-farmed slave and prostitution hell into a Democratic republic governed meaningfully by the Cuban people with dignity and education for all. All across east Asia it’s secured home rule and governments who meaningfully care and are comprised by regular working and peasant peoples. Marxism Leninism is the historical force which has been shown to be most able to grapple with the complex realities of our world dominated by white supremacy and capitalism, and fought back.

      It’s the reason that the supposed atrocities commuted by socialist countries are minor compared to the grand historic crimes of empires like France, Britain, the US, Germany, Japan, etc. Mistakes are made and have been made by socialist countries, sure, of course; but they were the first nations to attempt to meaningfully house people for the sake of housing. They were the first projects to successfully overthrow colonialism, and to raise literacy rates to an absurd degree even higher than in the United States today. These socialist projects need to defend themselves because very few other historical forces have shown anywhere near the potential to make a better world.

      So call it whatever you like, it’ll never erase the monumental good it’s done for the world.

      THIS is why people have a problem with Anti-Communists

      Statistics from 80 days into a ~460 day genocide, Gaza, 2025