@floofloof@lemmy.ca to U.S. News@beehaw.orgEnglish • 5 months agoCDC orders mass retraction and revision of submitted research across all science and medicine journals. Banned terms must be scrubbed. (Including gender, transgender, pregnant person, LGBT, and more)insidemedicine.substack.comexternal-linkmessage-square11fedilinkarrow-up177arrow-down10cross-posted to: usa@lemmy.mlscience@lemmy.world
arrow-up177arrow-down1external-linkCDC orders mass retraction and revision of submitted research across all science and medicine journals. Banned terms must be scrubbed. (Including gender, transgender, pregnant person, LGBT, and more)insidemedicine.substack.com@floofloof@lemmy.ca to U.S. News@beehaw.orgEnglish • 5 months agomessage-square11fedilinkcross-posted to: usa@lemmy.mlscience@lemmy.world
minus-square@notabot@lemm.eelinkfedilink8•5 months agoWould the journals be under any obligation to accept these bad-faith revisions or retractions?
minus-square@Midnitte@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglish3•5 months agoThe for-profit journals that are asking for more money, your asking what might motivate them?
minus-square@notabot@lemm.eelinkfedilink1•5 months agoThey already have the money for the original paper, do they charge for retractions? I don’t know, but I’d assumed not.
minus-square@Midnitte@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglish2•5 months agoI’m sure they’d love to charge more for retractions.
Would the journals be under any obligation to accept these bad-faith revisions or retractions?
The for-profit journals that are asking for more money, your asking what might motivate them?
They already have the money for the original paper, do they charge for retractions? I don’t know, but I’d assumed not.
I’m sure they’d love to charge more for retractions.