@floofloof@lemmy.ca to science@lemmy.worldEnglish • 5 months agoCDC orders mass retraction and revision of submitted research across all science and medicine journals. Banned terms must be scrubbed. (Including gender, transgender, pregnant person, LGBT, and more)insidemedicine.substack.comexternal-linkmessage-square124fedilinkarrow-up1873arrow-down19cross-posted to: usa@lemmy.mlusnews@beehaw.org
arrow-up1864arrow-down1external-linkCDC orders mass retraction and revision of submitted research across all science and medicine journals. Banned terms must be scrubbed. (Including gender, transgender, pregnant person, LGBT, and more)insidemedicine.substack.com@floofloof@lemmy.ca to science@lemmy.worldEnglish • 5 months agomessage-square124fedilinkcross-posted to: usa@lemmy.mlusnews@beehaw.org
minus-square@kernelle@0d.gslinkfedilinkEnglish20•5 months agoScience doesn’t need politics, politics needs science.
minus-square@zeca@lemmy.eco.brlinkfedilinkEnglish13•5 months agoscience needs politics to not be repressed, politics needs science for being effective and fair.
minus-square@kernelle@0d.gslinkfedilinkEnglish8•5 months agoScience doesn’t need politics to tell what is what, it’s science who should be telling politics what is what. Ofcourse politics can block science, e.g. this article.
minus-square@surewhynotlem@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish5•5 months agoNo it surely doesn’t. Politics can exist with no new science.
Science doesn’t need politics, politics needs science.
science needs politics to not be repressed, politics needs science for being effective and fair.
Science doesn’t need politics to tell what is what, it’s science who should be telling politics what is what. Ofcourse politics can block science, e.g. this article.
No it surely doesn’t. Politics can exist with no new science.
It can, but it shouldn’t.