Chris RemingtonM to Technology@beehaw.org • edit-22 months agoThe inarguable case for banning social media for teenswww.ft.comexternal-linkmessage-square74fedilinkarrow-up183arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up183arrow-down1external-linkThe inarguable case for banning social media for teenswww.ft.comChris RemingtonM to Technology@beehaw.org • edit-22 months agomessage-square74fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareChris RemingtonOPMlinkfedilink6•2 months agoThere! That’s much better! I agree and well done.
minus-squareMudManlinkfedilink21•2 months agoReally? You were going for some Socratic roundabout ironic thing? Could have just said what you thought, saved everybody the trouble. That feels a bit patronizing.
minus-squareChris RemingtonOPMlinkfedilink6•2 months ago You were going for some Socratic roundabout ironic thing? No. That feels a bit patronizing. That was not my intent. I apologize if anyone felt this way.
minus-square@Thevenin@beehaw.orglinkfedilink1•2 months ago@remington is all about healthy discussion. He doesn’t mind when people disagree, just as long as they say why.
minus-squareMudManlinkfedilink2•2 months agoPatronizingly cryptic AND with disciples coming in behind him to explain his whole deal. He should watch out for roaming cups of hemlock, just in case.
There! That’s much better! I agree and well done.
Really? You were going for some Socratic roundabout ironic thing? Could have just said what you thought, saved everybody the trouble. That feels a bit patronizing.
No.
That was not my intent. I apologize if anyone felt this way.
@remington is all about healthy discussion. He doesn’t mind when people disagree, just as long as they say why.
Patronizingly cryptic AND with disciples coming in behind him to explain his whole deal.
He should watch out for roaming cups of hemlock, just in case.