Chris RemingtonM to Technology@beehaw.org • edit-21 month agoThe inarguable case for banning social media for teenswww.ft.comexternal-linkmessage-square74fedilinkarrow-up183arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up183arrow-down1external-linkThe inarguable case for banning social media for teenswww.ft.comChris RemingtonM to Technology@beehaw.org • edit-21 month agomessage-square74fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareChris RemingtonOPMlinkfedilink6•1 month agoThere! That’s much better! I agree and well done.
minus-squareMudManlinkfedilink21•1 month agoReally? You were going for some Socratic roundabout ironic thing? Could have just said what you thought, saved everybody the trouble. That feels a bit patronizing.
minus-squareChris RemingtonOPMlinkfedilink6•1 month ago You were going for some Socratic roundabout ironic thing? No. That feels a bit patronizing. That was not my intent. I apologize if anyone felt this way.
minus-square@Thevenin@beehaw.orglinkfedilink1•1 month ago@remington is all about healthy discussion. He doesn’t mind when people disagree, just as long as they say why.
minus-squareMudManlinkfedilink2•1 month agoPatronizingly cryptic AND with disciples coming in behind him to explain his whole deal. He should watch out for roaming cups of hemlock, just in case.
There! That’s much better! I agree and well done.
Really? You were going for some Socratic roundabout ironic thing? Could have just said what you thought, saved everybody the trouble. That feels a bit patronizing.
No.
That was not my intent. I apologize if anyone felt this way.
@remington is all about healthy discussion. He doesn’t mind when people disagree, just as long as they say why.
Patronizingly cryptic AND with disciples coming in behind him to explain his whole deal.
He should watch out for roaming cups of hemlock, just in case.