@anus@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 2 months agoA cheat sheet for why using ChatGPT is not bad for the environmentandymasley.substack.comexternal-linkmessage-square47fedilinkarrow-up119arrow-down1130
arrow-up1-111arrow-down1external-linkA cheat sheet for why using ChatGPT is not bad for the environmentandymasley.substack.com@anus@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 2 months agomessage-square47fedilink
minus-square@anus@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglish0•2 months agoBasically no. What you’re calling tailored AI is actually low cost AI. You’ll be hard pressed, on the other hand, to get ChatGPT o3 to hallucinate at all
minus-squareSaik0linkfedilinkEnglish3•2 months agoNo, not basically no. https://mashable.com/article/openai-o3-o4-mini-hallucinate-higher-previous-models By OpenAI’s own testing, its newest reasoning models, o3 and o4-mini, hallucinate significantly higher than o1. Stop spreading misinformation. The company itself acknowledges that it hallucinates more than previous models.
minus-square@anus@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglish1•2 months agoI stand corrected thank you for sharing I was commenting based on anecdotal experience and I didn’t know where was a test specifically for this I do notice that o3 is more overconfident and tends to find a source online from some forum and treat it as gospel Which, while not correct, I would not treat as hallucination
Basically no. What you’re calling tailored AI is actually low cost AI. You’ll be hard pressed, on the other hand, to get ChatGPT o3 to hallucinate at all
No, not basically no.
https://mashable.com/article/openai-o3-o4-mini-hallucinate-higher-previous-models
Stop spreading misinformation. The company itself acknowledges that it hallucinates more than previous models.
I stand corrected thank you for sharing
I was commenting based on anecdotal experience and I didn’t know where was a test specifically for this
I do notice that o3 is more overconfident and tends to find a source online from some forum and treat it as gospel
Which, while not correct, I would not treat as hallucination