@kingpepe8006@sh.itjust.works to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world • 28 days agoOnion be onioning againsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square56fedilinkarrow-up1823arrow-down19
arrow-up1814arrow-down1imageOnion be onioning againsh.itjust.works@kingpepe8006@sh.itjust.works to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world • 28 days agomessage-square56fedilink
minus-square@yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilink2•26 days agoSchadensfreude isn’t invalid, it’s just a rare variant. The “s” allows for a smoother connection between the two words. If this spelling is confusing, just pretend the “s” is silent.
minus-square@FooBarrington@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink2•26 days agoI mean, it’s at least not valid in German. There might be people using that word in English, I don’t know.
minus-square@FooBarrington@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink3•edit-226 days agoZe fix? Ich stehe korrigiert, danke! Aber zu meiner Verteidigung: laut Ngram-Viewer ist Schadenfreude (~0.000130%) 144-mal so häufig wie Schadensfreude (~0.00000090%).
Schadensfreude isn’t invalid, it’s just a rare variant. The “s” allows for a smoother connection between the two words. If this spelling is confusing, just pretend the “s” is silent.
Do you mean silent as in ilent?
I mean, it’s at least not valid in German. There might be people using that word in English, I don’t know.
Ze fix? Ich stehe korrigiert, danke!
Aber zu meiner Verteidigung: laut Ngram-Viewer ist Schadenfreude (~0.000130%) 144-mal so häufig wie Schadensfreude (~0.00000090%).