• @Genius@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    11 day ago

    https://www.marxists.org/archive/james-clr/works/world/ch12.htm

    One year after Hitler, Stalin and Otto Bauer were still hoping to come to terms with Fascism. Being what they were it is clear that before they had had actual experience of Hitler, the idea of the German workers fighting Fascism would not have crossed their minds. “After Hitler, our turn,” is the concentrated expression of bureaucratic inertia, cowardice, ignorance and short-sightedness, Stalin could not say openly what he meant. He had to dress it up in revolutionary words, to promise the deluded German workers that the revolution would come after Hitler had come to power.

    We already tried accelerationism in the 1920s, genius.

    • @WraithGear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      010 hours ago

      It’s ironic that you accuse me of accelerationism, while you argue for a vote blue no matter who. Do you even know what accelerationism means? I do not advocate for democrats to lose the election, i advocate in having my votes be conditional to the furtherance of interests. The Democratic Party is the agent here, they are the ones who use accelerationist policy in an attempt get people to vote against their best interests, vote blue no matter who has always been a demand to silence progressive voices to meet right wing ‘centrist’ ‘half way’. My stance literally opposes democrat parties current accelerationism.

      • @Genius@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        110 hours ago

        Do you even know what accelerationism means?

        Not in opposite land. Have fun voting no preference on genocide, enabler.