@0x0@lemmy.zip to Programmer Humor@programming.dev • 27 days agorace conditionslemmy.zipimagemessage-square87fedilinkarrow-up1883arrow-down125
arrow-up1858arrow-down1imagerace conditionslemmy.zip@0x0@lemmy.zip to Programmer Humor@programming.dev • 27 days agomessage-square87fedilink
minus-squareJackbyDevlinkfedilinkEnglish1•26 days agoFun fact, some languages are not turing complete and I believe people would still consider them programming languages. They’re typically targeted at making mathematical proofs.
minus-square@nialv7@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink2•26 days agoI did say “general purpose”. And many proof assistants are Turing Complete actually, such as Lean.
minus-squareJackbyDevlinkfedilinkEnglish1•26 days ago I did say “general purpose”. I did say “fun fact”.
Fun fact, some languages are not turing complete and I believe people would still consider them programming languages. They’re typically targeted at making mathematical proofs.
I did say “general purpose”. And many proof assistants are Turing Complete actually, such as Lean.
I did say “fun fact”.