• @TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          02 years ago

          Widely blamed by whom? The West?

          At the failed Camp David summit, Arafat was ambushed by Clinton and Barak, when both presented him with a deal that was much more favorable to Israel than to Palestine. Source.

          But facts don’t matter to you. Ironic eh?

          • Bernie EcclestonedOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -12 years ago

            The proposals included the establishment of a demilitarised Palestinian state on some 92% of the West Bank and 100% of the Gaza Strip, with some territorial compensation for the Palestinians from pre-1967 Israeli territory; the dismantling of most of the settlements and the concentration of the bulk of the settlers inside the 8% of the West Bank to be annexed by Israel; the establishment of the Palestinian capital in east Jerusalem, in which some Arab neighborhoods would become sovereign Palestinian territory and others would enjoy “functional autonomy”; Palestinian sovereignty over half the Old City of Jerusalem (the Muslim and Christian quarters) and “custodianship,” though not sovereignty, over the Temple Mount; a return of refugees to the prospective Palestinian state though with no “right of return” to Israel proper; and the organisation by the international community of a massive aid programme to facilitate the refugees’ rehabilitation.

            Ambushed with the best deal ever. Sure.

            • @TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -22 years ago

              Sorry you typed all that in vain. If you’re trying to convince me, you’re gonna need to grant all Palestinians equal rights, and withdraw settlements from all occupied areas. If you want a 2 state; we go back to the 1967 borders and conditions. Deal?

                  • Bernie EcclestonedOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    -12 years ago

                    You just disagreed without reading the details, there’s no point arguing with someone who doesn’t know the details