Any games where a remaster could never stack up to the original.

Inspired by this post, asking the opposite, what games do you think are worthy of a remaster: https://lemmy.ml/post/6091201

  • I would have said dead space until the remake came out and blew me away. So if the devs really care about it no game is untouchable to me. You can always play the original.

  • @GreenMario@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    202 years ago

    Sometimes a simple port to modern systems with 60+ fps and widescreen/4K is all you need and in this case I say remaster everything good. There’s no excuse for a great game being permanently stuck on a Saturn or PS2.

    • metaStatic
      link
      fedilink
      52 years ago

      ICO could never have the same impact on a flat screen.

      heck most of the greats are great because they played with the limitations of the day and a 60fps widescreen release would just highlight the worst parts.

      I’ve hooked up a 2600 to a widescreen before and seeing whats going on outside the 4:3 scanlines can be interesting but it’s not a better experience than on a CRT.

    • @Que@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      Yeah fair enough, I wasn’t really considering ports to new systems when I asked the question. I was thinking more along the lines of, if they remastered something like SMW with more modern graphics or slightly different controls, it wouldn’t hold up to the original masterpiece. But then again flatscreens don’t display games designed for crt screens as well as they were initially intended. Maybe remakes would’ve been a better question!

    • Poggervania
      link
      fedilink
      02 years ago

      I am always for remasters, especially if they can somehow make it so it can easily be played across all current and future systems. Let people play old retro games and don’t let them get lost to time.

      That being said, remakes and rereleases can go screw themselves. Like I’d much rather have RE4 remastered rather than the RE4 remake because the original is still good. All remakes do is cash in on nostalgia and are probably easy to make because they already have the entire game mapped out - which is probably why they are so popular, but goddammit can we get something new instead of a game released 10+ years ago?

  • @LastYearsPumpkin@feddit.ch
    link
    fedilink
    English
    132 years ago

    No such thing, technology gets better and even games that feel perfect today would be better with newer UI, smoother framerates, or better controls.

    Of course you can say that the original Super Mario Brothers needs to exist still so people could keep working on speed runs, or just cause of the history, but a better SMB with new controls and smoother gameplay should always be on the table.

    • @angstylittlecatboy@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      I mean, the original SMB quadrilogy was one of the first remasters ever (they messed up the brick breaking physics in SMB1/LL though, so I prefer the original or a fixed ROM hack of All Stars for those.)

  • @Kolgeirr@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    11
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Phantasy Star Online. They’ve tried to release sequels over the years - Universe, PSO2 - and failed miserably at capturing what made Episodes 1 and 2 great. There’s no way they would be able to just update the graphics without trying to “improve” something in the gameplay, or changing the loot system, or adding MTX, and would just fuck it up again.

    PSO is so good that even now, 23 years after it launched on Dreamcast, there’s still hundreds if not thousands of people like me that still play regularly. Whether that’s offline on their GameCube or online in Blue Burst on PC on a server like Ephinea.

  • Mossy Feathers (She/Her)
    link
    fedilink
    82 years ago

    This isn’t quite what you’re asking, but Halo CE vs the MCC remaster. Halo: CE was superior visually-speaking to the MCC remaster because there were a lot of changes the MCC made to the lighting and textures which ruined the atmosphere of the original. That’s not to say the remaster is bad, it just isn’t good because it lost the original feel of the game.

    When it comes to games that could never be remastered, I think Hylics 1 and 2 fit the bill for me. It’s not that Hylics 1 couldn’t look better, but so much of the visual style relies on photographs and claymation that it’d be very, very hard to do a proper “remaster”. Hylics 2 is the same, except now there’s video you have to remake instead of still images.

    • all-knight-party
      link
      fedilink
      52 years ago

      Agreed. That was the first time I had really had an attachment to an original and then played the remaster. Of course, these are my opinions, but it felt as if any level with an originally dark atmosphere completely lost it. All of the architecture was overcomplicated for no real aesthetic gain.

      Being able to flip between the remaster and original with a button is a great feature, but really damned it further for me.

      For the most part, a good remaster should feel as if it’s a continuation of the original style, MCC’s version of CE just felt like they did that a quarter of the way, then a giant mutation occurred and warped it the rest of the way into something… different

    • BolexForSoup
      link
      fedilink
      5
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      I’ll go as far as to say Sabre’s lighting and coloring were terrible. The covenant interiors look nothing like their original counterparts. All the creepiness is gone. Frankly they ruined the entire look and vibe of halo CE. You also can shoot objects you can’t see because their overlay trick - which is admittedly very clever - needed more polish and sanding down of the edges. Nothing worse than shooting from behind a boulder only to find it’s 6in higher than it looks and your bullets are just stopping mid air.

      I only play on original graphics (the upscaling is great).

    • 520
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      Specifically, MCC’s version of Halo 1 is modelled after the Gearbox PC port of Halo CE, which is where the lighting and texture jank originates from.

  • Dznts
    link
    fedilink
    82 years ago

    Dishonored.

    That game looks beautiful, even if compared to some of today’s AAA titles.

      • Hot Saucerman
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        That was closer to a remaster of the original though, wasnt it?

        Source: played the shit out of both. Seemed just like mostly ported to PC from PS2 to me. Reroll feels very accurate to the OG.

    • @Car@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      42 years ago

      Hard disagree on this. The controls could be 1000% improved.

      I know, because I’ve purchased the same 3 or so Katamari games each time they’re rereleased and am moderately disappointed each time that they control like blind elephants.

        • @Car@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          In the same vein that FPS games use WASD movement with mouse aiming instead of arrow keys or… other early control schemes, sure.

          We’ve moved on to more ergonomic controls with custom keybinds for those who prefer something different. We get no choice with Katamari.

          If we collectively decide that developers know best and that no changes to controls are reasonable or desired, then I’ll happily withdraw my request for an accessible Katamari game.

          The users (specifically me) are just playing it wrong I guess.

  • I just want great ports, like what iD Software has done with Doom and Quake. I don’t care about updated visuals as long as I can play my favorite games in 1080p with modern controls.

    • 520
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      Ironically, the Doom and Quake versions you can buy now are essentially remakes. The artwork is the same but the backend code is completely redone. Modern official Doom ports now run in Unity.

    • Kadath (she/her)
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      Get Zanondrum and the official Doom and Doom 2 WADs, slap Brutal Doom on top and enjoy.

  • @trustnoone@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    62 years ago

    Honestly hard question because essentially you want a game that would be worse now. Something that playing now would tranish it then make it better even with updated graphics/movement. Or something you know the company would take a direction which would make it negative.

    Something like redoing the original Super Mario 1, 2 and 3. Where the updated graphics and changes to game play takes away from the original pixel feel. As I feel Nintendo would probably use modern day Mario design.

    or mass effects removal of zoooming in on mirandas butt

    • @Que@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      Agreed, SMW was actually the first thing that popped into my head when writing the post subject, SMB1-3 definitely qualify too. I’d put them all on equal footing in this regard.