Access options:

Yes, this means a ton of carbon ends up in the atmosphere instead of in the trees. The right move would be thinning and prescribed burns, but this administration isn’t going to do that.

  • @njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    2591 month ago

    These are our forests. They belong to the US people. They’re being stolen from us. For private profit of a few.

    • @Fluke@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      -581 month ago

      I mean, as the other guy pointed out, you as a people stole the fucking lot and literally massacred thousands upon thousands of people to do it.

      Shoe’s on the other foot now, eh?

      • @douglasg14b@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        611 month ago

        Ah yes, because native Americans celebrate the raping of their lands as long as the people who took it from them hundreds of years ago descendants (unlikely, given how many generations are immigrants) are also having their lands raped too.

        Get the fuck out here with this brain-rot level argument. 🤦

        Go stir the pot somewhere else.

        • @baines@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -21 month ago

          that shit didn’t stop happening ‘hundreds of years ago’ natives are getting fucked over by America regarding land rights as we speak

          fuck off yourself

          obviously you wouldn’t know this though because it only matters when it happens to you, typical privileged white america

        • @Fluke@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          -221 month ago

          You’re right in that it was a comment designed to “stir the pot”, if by that you mean, “make someone stop for a moment and consider their position in history”.

          I agree that any right thinking person, of Native American origin or otherwise should be aghast at the current US administrations utter destruction of everything, from old growth forest to human structures of civilisation.

          Reading it back, my comment sounds flippant and ignorant. That’s on me for commenting pre-coffee and smoke. 💛

          • @Madison420@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            -31 month ago

            Reading it back, my comment sounds flippant and ignorant.

            I don’t think you all on .ee can help that, you seem to be solely a propaganda instance.

            • @Fluke@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              01 month ago

              Have you even looked at my comment history to decide what kind of person I am, or did you decide that purely from where I registered my account over a year ago?

              • @Madison420@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                -21 month ago

                Have I seen you around yes, I believe we’ve even interacted before. That said no in don’t profile creep which is why I made a general statement I think I’m probably correct on.

      • JokeDeity
        link
        fedilink
        81 month ago

        And Britain stole the world, what point does any of this make? What do you want done about it?

        • @Fluke@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          11 month ago

          They did. And created and taught others some of the most reprehensible methods of population control and genocide the world has ever seen.

          Acknowledging it rather than denying it. Learning from the darkest parts of our history, to never have it be repeated is what I want done.

          Ignorance of our history is why it keeps repeating itself. Gestures widely

      • Suite404
        link
        fedilink
        01 month ago

        Both times it was the government to the greatest extent.

        • @Fluke@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          4
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          “The government” offered money for the task, and thousands took that money and got on with the job.

          “The Government” is people. Usually the worst, most manipulative self-serving people. It does what other people let it get away with.

      • @douglasg14b@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        51
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Moot, pointless, argument.

        This argument accomplishes what exactly? Aside from trying to just stir the pot or create culture war drama?

        It’s okay for public lands to be raped and razed now? Because (like damn near all the land in the world, everywhere) was taken during war/conflict?

        • @baines@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          the original comment was about ‘we’re being stolen from’ seems pretty relevant but I get how white America doesn’t want to think about it

          • @douglasg14b@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            11 month ago

            Our native Americans the only ones who are allowed to be concerned about the country it’s land and the environment?

            Your argument and point again only serves to further the culture war aspect of this and does nothing to address the problem at hand.

            • @Bloomcole@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              -11
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              No one asked for yours anyway.
              And are you mislabeling it as ‘small minded’ bcs it’s directly confronting your hypocrisy?
              Looks like you’ve got a case of the projections.

              • No one asked for yours anyway.

                And who asked for yours? Are you just special?

                And are you mislabeling it as ‘small minded’ bcs it’s directly confronting your hypocrisy?

                LOL, I’m not an American.

                Looks like you’ve got a case of the projections.

                ROFLMAO I can’t even, ZERO self awareness with this bloke.

                • @Bloomcole@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -21 month ago

                  Oh you’re from the country that’s clearly in the same boat.
                  Or the bigger boat since you plundered a lot more.

                • @baines@lemmy.cafe
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -61 month ago

                  imagine feeling the need to get involved when you have no skin in the game

                  how about you watch your people get fucked a few generations and while it’s going on this moment people are complaining about your response over their hypocrisy

          • Suite404
            link
            fedilink
            91 month ago

            Sorry I didn’t care 400 years ago. I’ll try harder.

            • @baines@lemmy.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              it’s happening to native lands in the US while we speak, the fact you are not even aware earns the ‘lol’

            • @Fluke@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              21 month ago

              How many cared when it was decided there would be an oil pipeline through the pittance they were relegated to? More land stolen, and everything around it polluted in time to add insult to injury.

              Did you care then, just a few years ago?

                • @Fluke@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  21 month ago

                  Not near enough to actually change a damn thing though, was it?

                  I mean shit, the company responsible is now trying to take down Greenpeace -the entire entity- in court over the whole affair, it is that confident in how fucked the US judicial system is.

                  They got to choose where to hold a trial with global ramifications, and tainted the entire possible jury pool by restricting it to some poxy little oil town that would cease to exist if not for the oil industry.

                  How many of you turned out to protest that?

                • @baines@lemmy.cafe
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  01 month ago

                  that’s better than nothing but that’s self interest and farmers were right to be worried

                  none of that changes anything on a national level nor changed the actual outcome so the criticism is still valid

            • Ricky Rigatoni
              link
              fedilink
              81 month ago

              What country are you from, and how many people did it ship over to north america to colonize it?

              • @baines@lemmy.cafe
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -11 month ago

                lol this thread full of privileged white Americans is whining about takes and then you drop this and it’s upvoted

                double down on the hypocrisy guys

              • @Bloomcole@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                -11 month ago

                We didn’t export criminals.
                And besides the point, it’s about admitting it happened.
                Which is very difficult for Americans looking at the angry reactions.

        • @Bloomcole@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          -51 month ago

          “bUt WhAT aBoUt ThE iNdIaNs???”

          bruh

          The opinion of people who write like this can’t be take seriously

  • Hello_there
    link
    fedilink
    1621 month ago

    Fuck. This kind of shit is why I feel the need for revenge on these people. They’re slashing forests and impoverishing the population. It’s not enough for them to lose an election. they need to pay

    • @johncandy1812@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      49
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Trump doesn’t like that the US buys lumber from Canada. He’s going to announce 34% tariffs on lumber from Canada in the next few days.

    • Suite404
      link
      fedilink
      161 month ago

      That our government has been reacting to his shit rather than controlling it is infuriating.

    • @finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      10
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Some national parks might be protected by legislation, such as the Yosemite Act of 1864, but massive amounts of land were protected by the executive branch such as Teddy Roosevelt protecting 150 Million Acres of forest and Joseph Biden protecting 674 Million Acres.

      Then you also have Treaties with native americans which can be considered law if Republicans actually acknowledged them as such (they don’t).

        • @untorquer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          61 month ago

          He appoints and directs the head of the department who, in turn, can more or less do so. They’ve been blatantly ignoring status quo and legal authority for a while now, so unless the supreme court gets the case and disagrees, they’re unlikely to stop.

  • @PantanoPete@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    701 month ago

    America is a dumpster fire lol, they have all these “checks and balances” but then one guy can just make all the trade policy and land use decisions by decree. What even is the point of their congress

    • @silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
      link
      fedilink
      271 month ago

      The problem is that Congress is controlled by people who are Trump sycophants — the Republican Party kicked out everybody who wasn’t.

    • @untorquer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      12
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      All governments at some level run on the honor system. When the whole government colludes to not honor the system, you get this.

    • @d0ntpan1c@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      101 month ago

      Problem is that both houses majorities support the lunatic, right now they’ve more or less given him a blank check to operate.

      Historically, the two party system has meant that Congress either votes with the presidents wishes or against when it comes to legislation, but Congress doesn’t directly approve/disprove of executive orders. To oppose executive orders, Congress needs to pass laws that override the orders. That wont happen unless the majority becomes convinced they’ll lose elections if they keep supporting trump.

      It’ll be up to the Judicial Branch to directly rule for/against this order. But the judicial branch only truly has power so long as the executive complies. We’re close to hitting the test of that power balance on some of his earlier orders.

      Fun fact: the law enforcement of the Judicial Branch is technically an agency under the Executive Branch. Not a problem if people are largely operating in good faith with the law, or at least fear repurcussions if they don’t comply… But since Trump doesn’t fear repurcussion, this fun fact may be the oversight that breaks the consitution.

      • @LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        The 2nd amendment is part of the Bill of rights which he already trampled multiple times. There is no right to bear arms anymore, they just haven’t had a reason to round anyone who uses them up yet.

  • @BarelyAdulting@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    531 month ago

    We get 30% of our lumber from Canada. This is the inevitable consequence of shutting our borders to trade via tariffs - if these policies stick around for four years, sure, we may bring some manufacturing home at great immediate cost, but we’ll also be bringing home the environmental burdens of manufacturing (the negative externalities) which we’ve been pushing onto other countries and ignoring for decades. In the meantime, other countries have started to learn how to handle those externalities, like China’s big push for solar power. In America, we’ve got an idiot who is rolling back worker safety, health and environmental protections, the list goes on. So even if these tariffs worked, we’re going to be living in a less healthy place, all in the name of jobs…

    • @grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      481 month ago

      This has nothing to do with the tariffs; even if those weren’t happening Trump would be selling the trees off to his cronies anyway. It’s a blatantly corrupt kleptocracy.

      • @nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        61 month ago

        It has everything to do with lumber tariffs, it’s just the other end of the equation. The forests are the supply, and the tariffs will create the demand.

        • SebaDC
          link
          fedilink
          131 month ago

          They are privatizing every single thing.

          Nothing to do with Tariffs. They just make the business more juicy for his cronies.

  • @Raiderkev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    401 month ago

    The absolute level of stupidity of this is ridiculous. Lumber mills are not designed for old growth trees in the modern era, so all these trees will not even become lumber. Logging has become very sustainable in recent decades. They farm trees and mill them when they reach the size that the machinery at the mills is optimized for. If we just cut down all the forests, the mills can’t even process the logs even though it’s better lumber. In reality, they’d just send the old growth logs to be ground for pulp which is a total waste. This video does a good job explaining it.

    https://youtu.be/efs5-FCVWvg

  • FundMECFS
    link
    fedilink
    38
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Trump is speedrunning to aim for the lowest biodiversity index in North America.

    Maybe if we stop ridiculously subisidising corn everywhere, some that gets thrown away because we have way too much, we could replace a couple dozen sq km of corn fields with more sustainable agroforestry, and thereby massively increase our logging output, instead of yk, cutting down the last wildlife sanctuaries? Not holding my breath tho.

    • @Delta_V@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 month ago

      i comfort myself with the knowledge that most worlds are totally dead

      zero wildlife is the normal state of things

      extinction is only sad to the survivors, and soon enough there will be none left to mourn

  • mosscap
    link
    fedilink
    English
    361 month ago

    My body is not ready for the amount of alcohol and dancing I am going to force myself to take part in on the day this motherfucker dies and goes to hell.

    Literally, the most destructive and evil human on the planet since Hitler. I can’t wait until the worms get him. I kind of feel bad for them, but I guess it’s part of the job.

  • @yarr@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    321 month ago

    Finally, a good move by Trump. Those trees are taking up incredible amounts of water. This is water that could be used for more productive things, like being mixed with Kool-aid powder on a hot day. Moreover, the trees emit large amounts of oxygen, a dangerous corrosive gas. Don’t listen to liberals – tree hugging is a dangerous activity that can lead to abrasions from all the bark.

    If there’s anything I learned from Dr. Seuss’ “The Lorax”, logging can lead to impressive industrial and commercial activity and has no downsides.

    • Ali
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 month ago

      It’s insane that I’m 99% sure this is sarcasm, but that 1% has a voice telling me I can’t discount Maga being that stupid. This is the age we live in, incredible stupidity.

    • @the_q@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      121 month ago

      I got a mod deletion the last time I said anything like this. Good luck and I fucking agree.

    • Aeri
      link
      fedilink
      71 month ago

      You’ve got to be careful how you word it lest the gestapo come for you. I will derive pleasure from reading his obituary though.

      I will also say that 18 U.S. Code § 2381 says that he should be well, you know. Or fined and put in jail for five years but that’s not as fun.