• CptKrkIsClmbngThMntn [any]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    132 months ago

    One of my smaller incentives for getting the family group chat off Messenger and onto Signal was to be able to share memes from Hexbear without converting them.

  • dblsaiko
    link
    fedilink
    112 months ago

    Decoder skill issue. If ImageMagick or whatever other open-source software can read it, everyone else has no excuse.

    (That said, if I could pick, I’d pick JPEG XL)

  • isame [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    102 months ago

    I was just complaining to a friend that I think it’s fucking absurd that Messenger still doesn’t work with webp but I now have an ‘imagine’ button for making stupid ‘AI’ art.

    • @HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Some sites still don’t support PNG lol. Usually it’s places where they specifically expect a photo, where they’ll hard code the validation to only check if it’s a JPEG. I once had to upload a picture of my face for something and the original JPEG was too large, so I took a screenshot and tried uploading that but it wouldn’t work because it only accepted JPEGs. So I had to figure out how to compress the image locally on my phone because I didn’t want to upload a picture of me to one of those online converters.

      • @Heavybell@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 months ago

        Yeah that’s true. I’m mostly talking local tools right now, but low tier sites are always gonna be a problem.

      • konalt
        link
        fedilink
        21 month ago

        The only program I’ve seen that explicitly doesn’t support PNG is old Source games with custom spray images.

  • Gianni R
    link
    fedilink
    English
    62 months ago

    Hilariously, WebP often isn’t better than JPEG for compression efficiency

  • @Biyoo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    61 month ago

    Every time I try to use webp the file is bigger than in jpg, why do people try to push it for the web ? Is it maybe faster to render for browsers ?

    • @vithigar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      31 month ago

      What compression settings are you using for each? If you’re just accepting defaults it’s quite possible you’re comparing against a lossless webp, which is quite likely to be larger than jpeg at typical quality settings.

      • @Biyoo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        5
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I just did a test with the first png I found and it looks like the default were lossless, hence why compression ratio were bad. Here the webp in smaller than the jpeg and noticeably better. Maybe it would be different for different kinds of picture, with colours, more details and stuff, but here it is clear.

        For now I stand corrected, webp is better.

        • @Biyoo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          21 month ago

          It may not be easy to see because the screenshot isn’t perfect, and lemmy compress it further, but the jpg clearly has some artifacts while the webp is slightly blurry.

  • TankieTanuki [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    32 months ago

    I wish it were more widely supported. It’s compatible with all of my KDE Desktop applications.