

Can you conceive of other motivations?
Can you conceive of other motivations?
Do you believe that the point of such assignments is because the teacher desires to read a couple dozen nigh-identical essays on the topic at hand?
Firings and jail time.
In lieu of that, high fines and firings.
Yeah there is. The law isn’t run on cartoon logic where you can get around a ban by putting on a fake mustache and a hat.
Re-forming with a new name is covered by the ban.
The rules they’d have to comply with to circumvent the ban are antithetical to what they are.
You can play the game, but flipping the table cannot be a legal move.
Don’t believe nazi propaganda about those things. They were largely inefficient and disorganized, they just predated others to fuel their goals. It’s one of the economic reasons for waging war on everyone: once you use up your local stolen wealth, you gotta raid other people’s. Nazi organizational structures were famously broken, with different redundant levels of political control pitted against each other, in line with social darwinist ideas.
And by far not all Nazis were true believers. Tons were “merely” playing along, because they thought they’d get something out of it. They often did, with the wealth of previously Jewish owned (and other) companies being handed to people close to the leadership.
These are parallels, not contrasts.
“Do you want this community to be about good things happening to people only or should it also include bad things happening to bad people?” would be more clear.
I think starting from a point of clarity in your own mind would help you here. “Uplifting” can mean many things, and the question is partially which concept of it you want this community to be about.
Is it good when someone responsible for so much suffering is experiencing hardship? Obviously. But the source of that goodness comes from a place where an evil person experiences something negative, and the only reason for this to be good is because of that starting evil. This also means that it is innately a bit of a reminder of the badness, which for many people can make it not-uplifting. There is no solution to this. Either reaction is valid, and you have to choose which type you want to foster here.
Politics is not a game and alleviating suffering is at its core political, and a staple of upliftingness. But this type of upliftingness is predicated on suffering. Choose, knowing that you can only ever please a subset of the population.
… What?
I find this post incomprehensible. The fictional veneer makes it more unclear what you’re trying to ask and the examples (?) seem like a random selection. The voting pattern seems to indicate that there are issues here for several people, maybe a clarification would be in order.
They are replaceable, it just takes some tools and work, both of which you can get at the phone repair shop.
It dominates everything else, few things are further away from water than (unfermented) cucumbers.
That’s when you should expect it more. Mistaking what is and isn’t a threat creates danger, also for the family, that needn’t be there.
Germany, France
Scholz was one of the people pivotal to removing the passage about socialism from the SPD manifesto.
"Im August 2003 vor dem 140. Jahrestag der SPD schlug der damalige Generalsekretär Olaf Scholz vor, den Begriff ganz aus dem künftigen SPD-Grundsatzprogramm zu streichen:[46]
„Es gibt keinen Zustand mit diesem Namen, der auf unsere marktwirtschaftlich geprägte Demokratie folgen wird. Deshalb sollten wir nicht solche Illusionen erzeugen.“"
What makes you think sexy peach is American? They might be, but I can think of a few indicators to the contrary.
What, she’s not very tall?
Pay an artist to do it for you or become an artist and do it yourself.
Relatedly, why does your name end with “Art”?
1-based indexing vs. 2-based indexing
Cool, can you show how big the effect is, based on your team’s efforts? And what the distribution of values is, based on sponsor?