There are already a few requirements for operating the balcony panels, At least here in Germany:

• You need a suitable electricity meter
• You have to register with a relevant authority and inform the electricity provider that you are operating a “balcony power plant”.
• The microconverter should run on its own secured circuit. (“Should”, will certainly do very few) But technically it is simple:

1. Set up panels
2. Connecting necessary plugs
3. Microconverter to the socket
4. Be happy that you produce up to 800 watts of your own electricity

I think it’s almost irrelevant how many panels you ultimately split up. However, no more than 800 watts may be fed in.But if you have panels with, let’s say, 2000 watts, you can of course charge various batteries with them beforehand. Nobody can say anything against it.

I had it until recently. It was always a bit too big for me. Now I have the Pixel 9 Pro (not XL) and I think it’s perfect!

And ignoring the call or turn DND on isn’t an option? No judgement, just curious.

They can agree as much as they want. They can agree to suck each other’s cocks too.That doesn’t change the facts. Stupid people remain stupid people.Populism remains populism Stop listening to them.

Chief executed officer?

Thanks for the new rabbit hole! 😁

Can you briefly explain how this works? Do you have a link or something similar?

This is a basic element of information gathering. Always check the source!

How many days do you think it will take until he calls for unions to be declared illegal?

Thanks for clarifying that. Here, too much fuss has been made about what was actually a side note. There were apparently already plans to modernize the facility anyway.

The costs of safely decommissioning and dismantling nuclear power plants are immense and are borne by taxpayers. In addition, there are high insurance premiums for operators. Renewable energies, on the other hand, are becoming increasingly affordable and make us less dependent on fossil fuels and their price fluctuations.

The future belongs to renewable energies. With them, we can ensure a safe, clean, and sustainable energy supply for generations to come. Nuclear power is a thing of the past.

Would you like me to combine these options into a single statement, or perhaps focus on a specific aspect of the arguments? For example, we could emphasize the economic benefits of renewable energy, or the environmental impact of nuclear power.

Because you’re reading the wrong media.

Furthermore, any energy production that has the potential to injure, harm or kill thousands of people cannot be considered safe. Just because nothing has happened so far.

What are you even talking about?!?! There is so much uranium in the world. Even if we completely switched over to nuclear power and without improvements in Nuclear tech, our sun would have fizzled out and we still would have uranium left. Uranium is more abundant than silver and we don’t need much to power a nuclear reactor.

And yet we would still be dependent on an industry, just as we are today on coal, gas and oil.

I like how people take Fukushima and Chernobyl as examples for disasters. Please go look up how many people have died from those disasters. Please go check. I’ll wait.

As others have already answered: far more people died than you claim here! How much land was made uninhabitable for centuries? How many animals would have to die? How much food would have to be destroyed because it was contaminated? What happens if a tsunami hits an offshore wind farm? They collapse… And then? Do they have to be rebuilt?But you can do that because the land has not been contaminated

Nothing about nuclear energy production is good, sensible and safe! You are dependent on a finite resource, you have to put in an incredible amount of effort to keep it running. Not to mention the damage caused by a malfunction (see Fukushima and Chernobyl).