No it isn’t

“I’d rather publicly expose myself in the public parking lot than allow people to mind their own business. It’s those evil wokists that are the real problem and exposing their genitals to kids”.

The best part about my project but was is that on mobile or with that you can just breed a dog whistle take random keyboard suggestions.

Piss on carpet.

I thought this was an onion article at first.

Fuck this place.

Surely this will make groceries more affordable.

I hope it’s effective.

Because it’s fucking stupid.

He makes the ferengi look generous and benevolent.

This isn’t gonna make eggs cheaper.

Do you have an actual argument, or are you just giving up? Because that in no way rebuts anything I said.

The native americans had lots of contracts and agreements with the U.S. government. It didn’t mean shit, and the government was still tyrannical.

A contract is meaningless when corporations can:

• bulldoze any citizen they like with legal teams
• force people to have go through arbitration
• delay and deny claims to demoralize claimants even if they have a valid claim
• use AIs that deny cases for the sake of it

They wield what is essentially unchecked and arbitrary power to the detriment of the people. It is cruel. It is oppressive. It fits the definition of tyranny easily.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-31558-z

The albedo decease from urbanization in 2018 relative to 2001 has yielded a 100-year average annual global warming of 0.00014 [0.00008, 0.00021] °C. Without proper mitigation, future urbanization in 2050 relative to 2018 and that in 2100 relative to 2018 under the intermediate emission scenario (SSP2-4.5) would yield a 100-year average warming effect of 0.00107 [0.00057,0.00179] °C and 0.00152 [0.00078,0.00259] °C, respectively, through altering the Earth’s albedo.

The albedo does have an effect, but not much of one. If we were to supplement every household with the ~30% solar power this article suggests, it would be a massive improvement and far outweigh the costs of the albedo.

Guessing here, but an absolutely a MINIMUM of an additional 20% find it secretly acceptable.

I can’t wait to see the NPR article titled “Luigi Mangione was [aquitted/convicted/excuted] years ago. Why do week keep hearing his name in comment sections?”, and I’ll see this NPR article like 5-6 years from now.

Epstien died ~5 years ago, yet I still keep seeing people talking about him.

They’re gonna attempt to do so. There’s no guarantee it will work.

The whole world is in love with Luigi from what I’ve seen with my international friends.

A hotline won’t solve the issue.

Have you killed thousands of people through insurance denials to make a quick buck? No?

Then you’re fine.

That’s conceptually backward to how our justice system (on paper) determines guilt. It has to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt that Luigi did it. Nobody else needs to be convicted or even accused for Luigi to be determined to be innocent.

And there are some good reasons to doubt from what we’ve seen as the public. The cops said they found his backpack in NY but then also found him with his backpack. The pictures don’t quite match. It doesn’t make sense for him to keep incriminating evidence on him in a McDonald’s. There’s a lot about it that stinks.

Dual purpose phrasing, I love it