- 0 Posts
- 34 Comments
Why not use tranquilizers? Field biologists use them to check up on wild animals, why can’t they use them on “criminals”?
My southwest flight will be on a max 8 both ways. Wish me luck.
If you don’t maintain your fleet, eventually they’ll all fall out of the sky
Yeah, I’d rather not get CWD from a deer I found dead on the road
Aside from the security risk, they’re probably mitigating the amount of traffic incidents that are bound to occur when the crappily coded cars enter the market
I’m not good with mushrooms… I’m not a mycologist…
Someone tell me when this becomes prescribable
Thisis what the nazis would’ve looked like if they were Asian or black
That’s bold to assume they will actually be made
I don’t get it. When does it become morally acceptable to block traffic?
Between Just Stop Oil and Stop Arming Israel, they both have equally valid points. So why is it that blocking the Golden Gate Bridge is “based” while blocking various feeder roads in Britain makes you a twat?
Edit: messed up the titles
I think the point was that her voice cracked and it was a comparatively mid halftime show
Just like the good ol’ days after 9/11
Testout labsim is where you’ll learn all the stuff you need (if you don’t just go to youtube). You’ll have to order (or redeem) your tests through comptia themselves.
Source: Took the test last year for A+ and Security+
Because it that case, you wouldn’t be able to slash any more tires.
It’s also not fun to be dead
Yes and no. On one (nihilistic) hand, you live to die. The other hand (the better one) is that you give your own meaning to live. Fill in the spaces between the living, dying, and suffering parts, to make them seem insufficient in comparison. Just like the time you spent with your cat.
Nothing makes either side any less true - it’s all up to interpretation. For your mental health, though, it’s better to follow the latter.
Yes. Albeit, I never mentioned anything about speech. It’s a bit weird that they immediately jumped to that. I’m mostly mentioning the fact that his senior moments severely outweigh other presidents. I mean, come on. The guy is 81.
I just don’t get how people are driven to pick the lesser of two evils when there’s much better options out there.
He has a card for meeting with ambassadors which literally says, in short form, “sit down. Say hello. Answer questions. Leave”.
He forgot how to stand on a bike. Hell, he forgets how to walk up stairs sometimes. Even walking on the ground, he sometimes ignores secret service instructions. He’s 81. 81. And I’m getting flak for calling him out?
I can get people defending Greg abbot for being disabled, because that’s not the point of his dilemma. This is different, because he is literally too old to be fit to serve.
Edit: I also never said anything about speech, where were you getting that from?
And yet I still can’t believe it’s not satire