

Can you explain this? Never heard of it.
Can you explain this? Never heard of it.
I too have been hoping for his usual fascist, use-then-discard tendencies to kick in.
We did not vote overwhelmingly for him. He barely won.
Smart lighting.
Specifically Philips Hue with the switches that look like normal switches/dimmers.
The bulbs are pricey but I’ve had some of them for 10-15 years. Still going strong.
Lol OK bud. 👍
The entirety of the OP is extending their experience of an hour or two in their own home (which is probably untrue) into:
Kids these days
Residents are expected
It’s the children who are wrong
From the OP:
Kids these days
Residents are expected
It’s the children who are wrong
Upon re-reading, the whole thing sounds like satire.
This is not true. To elaborate on what the other person who replied said… there is no safe level of lead in consumer products because lead accumulates in the body. Also, lots of consumer products still contain lead because there are loopholes. And the regulations any way aren’t that stringent.
I took my kids trick or treating and didn’t observe anything like what you’re describing. Pretty sure you made this up. Congrats on the internet points though!
*centuries
Can you provide something backing this up? I was under the impression it was at least a good jumping off point for looking at sources against the backdrop of conservative–progressive and solid journalism–blatant disinformation spectrums
Came here to suggest looking at rewasd
Yeah but without your comment I wouldn’t have posted mine!
Eh… it’s not that we’re trying to create meaning in the face of the absurd. The absurd is is the condition arising from the contrast between a human need for order and meaning on one side, and a lack of order and meaning (or lack of ability to grasp the order and meaning) on the other… and it’s this absurdity that defines the human condition. And we should embrace it.
Honestly someone who spends their whole life searching for a universal morality could very well be embracing absurdism as well.
I also feel that the positivity surrounding absurdity comes from the fact that the absurd is the struggle (roughly between a desire and search for order and meaning) and the struggle is the human condition. And once you think about the struggle-not as something to overcome or win-but as the basic defining characteristic of humanity… you start to view the whole thing positively.
Kinda, but also the core of the absurdity is the contrast between the human need for meaning and order - and the inherent inability to find and create it ultimately. And as an added flavor, this absurdity is the main definition of the human condition. It’s not exactly enjoying pseudo-meanings. It’s enjoying the absurdity.
Recommend: the myth of sisyphus by camus. I believe you can find a full pdf of it online on some university website or another.
Wtf does “democratic process” even mean though? It’s literally not feasible to restart the primary process at this point is it? Like you want people to arrange getting off work, researching candidates, etc etc etc ?
In an interview I heard, a party official made it clear than anyone who would like to run for president needs 300 delegates’ worth of support. That’s out of over 4000 delegates. So realistically, if someone else wants to be considered, they need to convince less than 10% of delegates that they’re worth a shot, then tell the party that… like this week.
It all has to be settled before Aug 7 because Ohio state officials (who happen to be republican) set a deadline prior to the dnc convention (presumably they set this deadline after the convention was scheduled…)
This is all more or less spelled out in black and white despite the unprecedented scenario.
But there IS a process and they are following it…
Pretty sure when I counted, the numbers were off. Not even 13 people in the supposed last supper shot.
Every 4 years.
First_time_?.jpeg
Thanks this is really interesting. Literally hadn’t heard of this before.