Both of you are assholes.
Nothing warrants destroying things over a perceived misgendering.
At the same time, a bit of an asshole response from you, when you could have just politely said that you meant dude as gender neutral term
Both of you are assholes.
Nothing warrants destroying things over a perceived misgendering.
At the same time, a bit of an asshole response from you, when you could have just politely said that you meant dude as gender neutral term
Unpopular opinion, but Tesla model 3 has been the best car with the lowest total cost of ownership.
Electricity is cheaper than gas by a lot, no moving parts or fluids to replace except washer fluid, brakes last forever since it’s Regen braking.
It’s also pretty fun to drive.
Not a fan of the dude, and never bought into the hype on the tech side, but it’s a solid car.
No, because I need too much information for work. This would render me unable to perform my work, so I would need at least the replacement salary.
Not really.
Now the 15 sponsored links will be irrelevant to YOU as a user since they can’t personalize the ads.
They can still use context advertising which does not use your personal information but only what you are giving to them for search.
Amazon search is probably the least impacted by this, since they use context advertising by default.
Rampant alcoholism.
I’m in tech and It’s literally not falling.
People are still hiring, just the bar is no longer absurdly low.
During the pandemic, everyone was hiring like crazy, and people coming out of boot camps were instantly hired even when they didn’t understand algorithms, didn’t understand system design, and didn’t understand engineering principles.
Now, you actually need to have a brain to be hired.
Tech is also not a bubble, because tech is in every single industry now. You might get froth in certain segments of tech (crypto, AI, whatever is the current “hot thing”), the market fundamentals are absurdly good. Operating margins of mature software companies are consistently in the mid 20s to 30s.
Degrowth is a dangerous ideology. For those living in rich countries, degrowth might just mean austerity, for those living in middle and lower income countries, degrowth is going to mean destitution and certain death for x percentage of the population.
You mean x football fields.
Coincidentally both “football fields” are pretty close in length.
Assuming x percentage of legally acquired guns can be diverted to illicit means.
Less overall Availability of guns means less overall availability of guns in the illicit market.
Disenfranchised minorities. I mean the Panthers literally started California gun control.
Though I think more gun control is no doubt better for society.
But with the rise of AI, what if it destroys our institutions of “knowledge” by removing the role of schools as a source of teaching not just charge them to glorified babysitter centers?
This.
YouTubeTV carries network channels that directly charge YouTube TV carriage fees. Those channels charge a pretty hefty fee regardless of who you get the channels through.
https://variety.com/vip/pay-tv-true-cost-free-1234810682/
This is not YouTube premium.
It actually does get higher revenue for content creators for the majority of your creators. Average per view is something like 5-10x vs non premium views.
It’s based around your watch time and something like 50%? of your subscription split across the channels you watch.
Ad impressions pay very little on YouTube.
That’s not how any of this works.
Removing the Canadian news from Facebook doesn’t hurt Facebook one bit. It’ll just hurt Canadians by preventing them from seeing news from local sources.
Facebook never needed news to keep people engaged. They just need content, and they don’t give a shit whether that content reflects reality or not, nor do they care of the content came from Canada.
But hey, I’m the corporate shill right? Whatever helps you sleep better at night.
Oh great, I was hoping we left all the sarcastic non-comments that attack people and adds nothing to the discussion in the speddit botscape.
Can we not?
This is not great at all. You’ll just have pseudo “news” organizations fill the void.
Your crazy uncles won’t stop sharing articles, but instead of coming from Fox News, they’ll be coming from AI spin-offs of infowars and AI Epoch times.
No, unless you are leveraging evaporative cooling, that amount of circulation isn’t going to get you much.
Just get a real geothermal hvac system if you have the opportunity. Incredibly efficient.
Back of the napkin conversion: 20btu/sqft recommended cooling capacity. 1btu = 252 calories (small)
A 60k btu cooling needs
15120000 gram degrees C of water. Assuming you have perfect heat exchanger on both ends, that’s 15120 liters-degrees circulated per hour.
Pumping that much water alone is going to be quite a bit of energy.
Then you have the problem of heat exchanger. There are lots of sizing mostly based on the deltaT temperature difference.
Realistically, without some agent evaporating and recondensing, you’ll have a massive water to air heat exchanger that’s not practical at all.
If you want to do more research yourself, heat exchanger sizing can be found in mechanical engineering and chemical engineering handbooks.
US embargoed Japanese oil and rubber and the imperial war machine would’ve grounded to a halt without Philippines (US territory) rubber and Dutch Oil.
Not justifying it, but strategically, war with the US was inevitable for imperial Japan.
Chaotic neutral should be a solo laptop screen.